I. Revisionist Adaptation (The Evolution Thesis): This central view features the newly reconstructed Columns XI–XIII, analyzing Hierocles' ideas as a physicalist model of evolution long before Charles Darwin. It integrates modern biological spectrum casework on animal behavior and kin selection to validate the ancient text on its merits, supported by the SBL edition by I. Ramelli.
Definitive Proclamation of the Thesis
In this video recording, the definitive moment of the thesis is proclaimed: Hierocles bridges the gap between biological self-perception (physics) and ethical duty (morality), showing that the self-love of the newborn animal is the sole empirical foundation for cosmopolitan concern.
Section I: The Physiopneumatic Birth
Fetal Breath to Perceptive Soul...proceeding from the beginning to the end in preestablished order. Now, in the first phases... the pneuma is a kind of particularly dense pneuma and far removed from soul; following this... it thins out, buffeted as it is by continuous doings, and, in respect to quantity, it is soul...
...The fetal pneuma remains a vegetative nature (physis). At the moment of birth, the physical shock of the outer cold air acts as a catalyst, tempering the breath. It thins out (manosis) and is transformed into soul (psyche).
Jowett's Reconstruction & Ramelli Synthesis: Jowett introduces the metaphor of breath in a stone sparking with flame to illustrate the materialist tempering of fetal pneuma. This aligns with Ramelli's Commentary Note 6, which details Chrysippus's doctrine (SVF 2.806) that the fetus in the womb is vegetative nature, and at birth is cooled (psyxis) and tempered by environmental air to become soul (psyche). Jowett's commentary on veganism as a dietary hegemony directly reflects the Stoic division in Note 2 regarding the primary orientation (proton oikeion) of living things: the emergence of somatic consciousness separates the vegetative plant from the evaluative animal, grounding ethics in the physics of nourishment and life-preservation.
Section II: Sunaisthesis & Animal Defense
Continuous Self-Awareness...the asp will be found to have understood clearly that it has at its disposal tail parts that are vulnerable, whereas it is furnished with a weapon... namely, its mouth... beaver testicles... lion watching bull's horns... chicks hiding from falcon...
...These biological examples prove that an animal continuously perceives its own constitution (systasis) and capabilities. Sensation requires an underlying self-perception (sunaisthesis) that persists even during sleep.
Jowett's Reconstruction & Ramelli Synthesis: Jowett's adaptation adds strategic political/military color: framing the beaver's self-castration as a form of spy-craft and sabotage to secure survival, and detailing the toad's precipice calculation. This aligns with Ramelli's Commentary Note 41, which points out that Hierocles introduces these biological weapons as an anti-skeptical thrust: proving that self-perception is not a late cognitive development, but an active, innate property of the soul. In evolutionary terms, these "sabotage" behaviors illustrate the high cost threshold of survival adaptations, which are validated by the modern biological spectrum:
- Sensory-Evoked Phenotypic Plasticity: Water fleas (Daphnia pulex) develop defensive neckteeth or helmets only in the presence of predator chemical signals (kairomones), verifying Jowett's model of sensory-evoked morphological adaptations.
- Epigenetic Phase Shifts: Solitary locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) change into gregarious swarmers via serotonin triggers from physical leg stimulation, showing that somatic contact alters behavioral disposition.
- Costly Autotomy: Lizards (Uta stansburiana) drop their tails under threat, mirroring Jowett's "sabotage" beaver castoreum stratagem where immediate tissue is sacrificed to secure genetic survival.
- Nociceptive Homeostasis: Organisms maintain physical boundaries by minimizing prediction errors (Friston's Free Energy Principle) between internal homeostatic states and external threat indicators.
Section III: Sunaisthesis & Body Schema Extensions
Continuous Self-Perception and Extended Cohesion...the soul is not enclosed in the body like a bucket... but blended like red hot iron, so that they share all effects... even in sleep we perceive ourselves... the miser holding tight his purse in sleep, the drunkard sleeping with his flask... Heracles sleeping grasping his club...
...The soul is a cohesive, physical force (pneuma) with tensive movement (tonos). Self-perception is continuous, persisting even in sleep. Organisms extend this internal tensive mapping to encompass external objects of care.
Jowett's Reconstruction & Ramelli Synthesis: Jowett's adaptation frames the miser's purse and drunkard's flask as external cohesion, where the soul treats tools/objects as part of its own physical layout. This maps to the modern neuroscience concept of tool-use body schema extension. Sensation requires continuous somatic tension. In Jowett's commentary, nutrition and diet are the core engines of the soul's tensive motion (tonos). This is synthesized against Commentary Note 4, which describes the paternal seed's systematic development, requiring homeostatic energy. Jowett's addition of "nutrition as hegemony" proves that the physical soul requires material inputs (diet) to maintain continuous self-perception and survival capacity.
Section IV: Social Oikeiōsis & Circle Contraction
Cosmopolitan Scaling of Concern...first, it is necessary to consider that we are an animal, but a sociable one and in need of others. Because of this we dwell in cities: for there is no human being who is not part of a city. Then, we easily form friendships... And this is the most wondrous of all...
...[XII, 45] ... it [was] discovered ... human beings and ... [55] the end [telos] for us must be considered further ... since also ... strongest ... [60] [papyrus breaks off]
...This sociability is "the most wondrous of all," as seen in the Socratic ideal of friendship arising even between members of enemy armies. Nature's affinity is so strong that it bridges political divides.
Therefore, we must state how the appropriation (oikeiōsis) toward oneself extends to society. The mind, being rational, scales its concern through concentric circles: the first is our own body; the second contains parents, siblings, spouse, and children; the outer circles encompass Deme-members, fellow citizens, and finally the entire human race.
Jowett's Reconstruction & Ramelli Synthesis: Jowett's adaptation (Section 5) details the debate between Chrysippus and Cleanthes over original disposition, and introduces the baby bird that grows wider, stronger wings. This directly maps to Ramelli's Notes 53-54 ad Col. VIII/IX, which outlines their debate on Zeno's concept of representation: Cleanthes defines it as a rigid "imprint" (like a ring in wax), whereas Chrysippus defines it as a dynamic "alteration" (heteroiōsis) of the soul. Jowett translates this into a biological framework: Chrysippus's alteration represents **phenotypic variation** and **adaptive evolution**, where the offspring's "indefinite representation" is physically molded by selection pressures. The baby bird's physical variation (wider wings) represents a positive somatic mutation that is favored by natural selection.
Section V: Lost Column XII Outcomes & Jowett's Allegorical Reconstructions
Alternative Speculative Paths in Ramelli's FootnotesIn her SBL commentary and footnotes, Ramelli outlines three distinct trajectories hypothesized by commentators to complete the lost columns following the papyrus's abrupt break at Column XII:
1. The Parental Affinity (Stergê) Path: Found in Cicero (De Finibus 3.19.62ff), which traces the biological origin of social oikeiōsis to parents' natural affection for offspring. Altruism is a direct expansion of reproductive self-love.
2. Hans von Arnim's Spontaneous Friendship: Suggesting that the "most wondrous thing of all" at Col. XI.20 is friendship arising spontaneously between opposing soldiers of enemy armies. This indicates that natural human sociability overrides political divisions and conflict.
3. Bastianini & Long's Deontological Continuity: Proposing that the text transitioned to appropriate actions (kathēkonta) and virtues, seamlessly connecting the physical foundations of the papyrus to the Stobaean extracts on household, marriage, and civic duties.
Jowett's Reconstruction & Ramelli Synthesis: Jowett's speculative reconstruction (Section 6-7) introduces baby Hercules strangling Hera's serpents, the "governor-general" deploying troops, and the Spartan charge against Athens. This synthesizes Ramelli's three trajectories into a coherent sociobiological model:
- Hercules & The Serpents (Innate Tonos): The baby Hercules strangling serpents represents the primary tensive motion (tonos) and self-perception of the newborn overcoming environmental pressures. It is the raw materialist basis of survival.
- The Mother's Love (Kin Selection): The mother protecting her offspring even when they boast unusual traits represents Cicero's sterge, mapped to Hamilton's Rule ($rB > C$). In cooperative breeders like meerkats (Suricata suricatta) and wild dogs (Lycaon pictus), this biological stergē scales altruism to inclusive fitness groups.
- Spartan Charge vs. Enemy Friendship (Reciprocal Altruism): The conflict of Sparta vs. Athens and the governor-general represents the group-selection limit. Von Arnim's "enemy soldier friendship" represents Triversian reciprocal altruism and the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma (Generous Tit-for-Tat), where cooperation emerges as a stable evolutionary strategy (ESS) to transcend group warfare.
- The Governance of the State (Duties / Culture): The governor-general's deployment of rules represents E.O. Wilson's model of human eusociality, where cultural duties (kathekonta) and the "Onomastic Stratagem" act as group-selected cultural hacks to scale cooperation globally.
The Sensation-Reason Debate: Refuting Engberg-Pedersen Erskine (1992) Academic Loading
Troels Engberg-Pedersen (1990) argues that moral development is driven purely by practical reason, playing down the normative role of cosmic nature. However, Andrew Erskine's 1992 critique points out E-P's error in omitting Hierocles' Elements of Ethics, which explicitly bases moral oikeiosis on physical sensation and self-perception. Sensation is not a separate non-evaluative state, but the biological foundation of evaluation. Because self-perception is continuous (sustained by psychophysical krasis and tonos), the transition from self-love to social concern in Column XII is a logical, cognitive expansion of bodily awareness to other rational bodies.